Brand association

Don’t let Labels hold you back – Building a deeper Brand connnection

Going by the trends, it was really hard to ignore this Pantene advertisement. This ad has garnered about 6.8M visits with 17K likes till today and the count is growing. Sheryl Sandberg’s vote helped no less!

The ad created by BBDO for airing in the Philippines has re-ignited a debate on perception of women in society especially workplace. There have been earlier attempts as well, but this seemed to have created a resonance. The ad basically talks about the differences in perception between a woman and a man for exhibiting similar characteristics. So for example, while a man could be called a boss, women will be referred to as bossy, similarly a persuasive man would be a pushy woman, a neat man would be a vain  woman, and so on and so forth.

But  aren’t these labels true? For in a male-dominated corporate world, doesn’t a woman need to be all these labels and more to show the same results as a man in a similar position? One reason, the ad has been trending so much, is because; it is all so very true. A woman today doesn’t just have to compete with men, but also compete with the challenge of establishing acceptance and credibility. And in doing so, she may end up looking bossy, pushy, vain, etc. reinforcing the stereotype. While this ad has got the required eyeballs and discussions going; I do hope it stirs debate on the very reasons that bring such labels.

Coming back to the advertisement per se, while the Pantene ad has broken away from the stereotype associated with beauty products, it definitely was not the first. That feat goes to Dove.  Dove was instrumental in creating a campaign that questioned the very definition of beauty and this was way back in 2004!!!

Dove started a campaign in 2004 with the objective to celebrate the natural physical variation embodied by all women and inspire them to have the confidence to be comfortable with themselves.* This campaign started with a series of billboard advertisements and with the media exposure that it resulted, expanded to visual media with a series of television spots. In 2006, O&M started the first of the viral videos for the ‘Campaign for Real Beauty’ series. First of the lot was ‘Daughters’ – an interview style piece that focused on the perception of beauty and their related impact on mothers and daughters.

This was followed by its most famous piece ‘Evolution’ – a piece that shows the transformation of an ordinarily pretty woman to a billboard model using makeup and a lot of Photoshop.2 This was one of the most talked about, critically acclaimed advertisement for a long time to come. Dove then followed up with a series of advertisements called Onslaught and Amy to follow up on this series. This series is still carrying on, the last being a set of Beauty Sketches that were released earlier this year.

What’s remarkable is Dove’s dedication to this campaign over the past 1o years; especially in a product category that inherently feasts on the insecurity of women.  One cannot but compare the two campaigns; while the Pantene advertisement, questions the various labels and exhorts women to carry on despite labels; the advertisement still features models and does provide the visual imagery of advantages of ‘looking pretty’!.

Dove on the other hand goes for the jugular; it questions the very perception of beauty and asks people to look beyond and look within. For that, my hat goes off to Dove!

What is indeed heartening is the effort of brands to go beyond the immediate association and look to create an association that’s much deeper and meaningful. What is also encouraging is the positive reaction that’s coming in for such efforts. One can only look forward to more such campaigns!

* Dove Support Page: http://web.archive.org/web/20070816112659/http://www.campaignforrealbeauty.ca/supports.asp?url=supports.asp&section=campaign&id=1560

2 – Evolution: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_(advertisement)

3 – Onslaught: http://youtu.be/9zKfF40jeCA

Sachin’s Last Test series and some Missed Opportunities!

Today’s the start of the last Test series for Sachin Tendulkar – a legend and a hero to more than a billion of the World’s population….and I had no clue the series was starting today! The past few weeks have seen a flow of articles, montages, TV shows, interviews, etc etc highlighting his achievements, but very few that actually gave the date and time for the series to start…Well, the assumption would’ve been and rightly so, that a true fan would take the trouble to find out and I don’t really fall in that category; so I guess it’s fine. So, having a relatively late start today, I happened to see the start of this test. It was mainly for posterity purposes, so sometime in future, I can tell the next generation (if they care i.e.) that I was lucky to watch (on TV) Sachin’s last two tests (even though it was only about 5 minutes)!

While watching the test, a couple of things caught my attention and I couldn’t resist the urge to pen them down!

1. Getting to know about the Test match

ImageI would’ve blissfully gone about my daily chores had TataSky not decided to include the match into their default starting channel (No. 100). This is the channel that starts up every time you switch on the DTH box. Now, normally this channel would include promotional campaigns from Tata group companies and more often just features about Tatasky. However, today the channel started with Star Sports 3 with Kapil Dev speaking in Hindi! What a freaking smart move by TataSky and Start Sports to lure in ignorant cricket fans like me!!  Truly impressed, for once the media house got it right!

But then this was the end of all positives from a marketing and communications standpoint…

2. Where is ESPN?

ImageWell after learning about the Test match, I tried to surf to the HD variety for an ad-free (actually to be honest – an English commentary) viewing. I surfed through the sports channels and kept seeing Star Sports! On closer look however, it said Star Sports 1,2,3, HD1, HD2 .. Where the heck is my ESPN?

Surfing online, I realize that Star has decided to retire ESPN from India. Browsing through news reports, it is learnt that Star was initially contemplating converting ESPN to Fox Sports and has now decided to just retire the brand (news article below). Why the hell would you do that? Why kill a good thing?

At last count; TataSky itself has 12 sports channels with 6 of them from the Star family! 6 Sports channels telecasting different sporting events and differentiated …by a number? Seriously?? That is your strategy and it took you all of 2013 to figure that out??? As it is, life was getting difficult juggling between EPL, La Liga, Cricket and F1 and now the viewer also has to remember the channel number! I am beginning to miss the good old Doordarshan, forget channel surfing, everything came on the one channel. Plus, I would’ve also stayed in touch with Mohan Bagan and East Bengal!

Imagine, HUL replacing its brands Wheel, Rin and Surf (all catering to different customer segments) with numbers …HUL1, HUL2 and HUL3! Why would a firm kill a brand with known associations, great differentiation and good reach? Especially, when the firm just replaces it with a number?

3. Sachin, Nike and a humongous missed opportunity?

One more miss and this was sort of just came daunting to me..Check out Sachin’s signature below; what do you see?

Image

Do you notice that swoosh below the signature? I wonder if Nike ever noticed it as this would’ve been a ‘out-of-the-world celebrity-brand association’ for the firm! Imagine, Sachin Tendulkar, hero to approximately 17% of the world (definitely more), belonging to (arguably) the world’s second-fastest growing economy and a billion customers!

Image

I couldn’t help check Sachin’s brand associations today, not bad for a retiring sportsman belonging to a sport played by a dozen countries! Look at the irony here, Sachin endorses Adidas and Nike gets his sports jersey. So Sachin has a swoosh on his chest and bats for Adidas.

But that’s going away from the topic. Here is a legend who’s signature has your brand logo; why wouldn’t you want him? This was a known fact for over two decades now! In all probability, Nike did realise or rather Adidas did and retained Sachin at all costs!

But imagine this association, had it been, a legend putting the firm’s logo every time he signs anywhere – an autograph book, a TV camera, a fan’s shirt / cap / whatever! Imagine the possibilities Nike could’ve used with this one signature! Imagine a Nike T-shirt, with nothing but his signature and the swoosh below! What a Brand and Product association that could’ve been! Alas, if only, someone noticed and make the effort!

Sources:

*Note – Sourcing of pictures and articles from the below sources was with no specific intentions, but purely a result of Google search

1. Tatasky logo: Quickr.com

2. ESPN Start Sports logo: Sportskeeda.come

3. News Article about Start Sports retiring ESPN: http://www.livemint.com/Consumer/b2j9IeMRzaoVPlCHFYrbKI/Why-Star-Sports-is-retiring-ESPN-brand-in-India.html

4. Sachin’s Signature: Wikipedia.org

5. Sachin’s picture: fanpop.com